This Project Gutenberg volume contains two short prose works by Tacitus in the revised Oxford Translation. The Agricola is a biography of Cnaeus Julius Agricola, the Roman general who completed the conquest of much of Britain and who was the author's father-in-law. The Germania is a treatise on the situation, manners, and inhabitants of Germany. Both were written near the end of the first century, soon after the death of the emperor Domitian.
The Agricola moves from the man's early career to his governorship of Britain. Tacitus describes the campaigns northward into Caledonia, the discipline of the army, and Agricola's mix of military skill and administrative care. The biography is also a defense of how to live under tyranny: Tacitus insists that submission joined to vigor and industry can raise a character as high as reckless defiance, and that even under a bad prince a man may be truly great.
The most famous passage is a speech Tacitus gives to Calgacus, leader of the Britons before a decisive battle. In it the conquered describe the Romans as plunderers of the world who, having exhausted the land, now rifle the ocean, and who make a desert and call it peace. By placing this indictment in an enemy's mouth, Tacitus voices a critique of empire that a Roman writer could not safely state directly.
The book closes with Agricola's recall, his quiet later years, his death amid rumors of poison, and a long eulogy. Tacitus turns the loss into an argument about memory and example: the form of a great man's mind outlasts statues and is preserved by the conduct of those who survive him. The grief is sharpened by the cruelty of Domitian's reign, which Agricola was, in a sense, fortunate not to see in full.
The Germania shifts from biography to ethnography. Tacitus surveys the land and the tribes beyond the Rhine and Danube, treating the Germans as an indigenous people shaped by a harsh climate. He describes their gods, assemblies, and warfare, the strict bond between a chief and his sworn companions, and a domestic life he presents as severe and chaste. Throughout, the admiration is double-edged: the freedom and hardihood of the tribes serve as a standing rebuke to Roman luxury, while their disunity is also noted as Rome's protection.