Understand in about 5 minutes

Utilitarianism

by John Stuart Mill

Mill defends the Greatest Happiness Principle, the view that the right action is the one producing the most well-being, and argues that higher pleasures of the mind outweigh lower pleasures of the body, and that justice is ultimately grounded in utility.

PhilosophyCharacterMindPurpose

Idea map

The book in 4 ideas

Utilitarianism Mill's defence of the Greatest Happiness Principle as the foundation of morality.
  • Greatest Happiness Principle

    The master criterion: actions are right in proportion as they promote happiness.
    • Higher Pleasures Quality of pleasure matters, not only quantity.
    • Impartiality Every person's happiness weighs equally.
  • Proof of the Principle

    The only evidence that happiness is desirable is that people actually desire it.
    • Means Become Parts of Ends Virtue desired for itself is part of happiness.
    • Desire and Pleasure Desiring a thing and finding it pleasant are inseparable.
  • Sanctions of Duty

    The motivating forces that back up utilitarian morality.
    • Conscience Conscience is the ultimate internal sanction.
    • Social Feeling Sympathy with humanity reinforces the principle.
  • Justice and Utility

    Justice is not separate from utility but is utility concentrated on indispensable interests.
    • Rights and Security Security is the most indispensable human interest.
    • Justice vs. Expediency Justice's intensity reflects the stakes of security.

Mental models

3 ways of thinking you can use

Competent Judges of Pleasure

The quality of a pleasure is decided by those who have experience of both the pleasure in question and the alternatives. Their settled preference, not a priori calculation, determines which pleasures are higher.

How it helps

It gives utilitarianism an empirical test for comparing pleasures that avoids both pure hedonistic counting and arbitrary stipulation.

Equal Weight to Every Person

Utilitarian morality requires the agent to count their own happiness as no more than equal to the happiness of any other person when deciding what to do.

How it helps

It transforms private desire into a moral standard by demanding impartiality, and it explains why the greatest happiness of all, not of the agent, is the correct goal.

Means Incorporated Into Ends

Things originally desired only as instruments to happiness, such as virtue, money, and power, can through association become parts of happiness itself, desired for their own sake.

How it helps

It explains how a person can love virtue intrinsically while the utilitarian foundation remains intact: virtue has become an ingredient of happiness, not a rival principle.

Summary

The essence in plain English

Utilitarianism opens by noting that philosophy has never settled the question of what makes actions right or wrong. Mill argues that the utilitarian answer, the Greatest Happiness Principle, has in fact shaped moral thinking across rival schools without being clearly acknowledged. His aim is to correct common misunderstandings and then offer such grounds for accepting the principle as the subject admits.

Chapter II defines the doctrine. Utility is not opposed to pleasure; it is pleasure itself and the absence of pain. Mill then introduces the crucial distinction between higher and lower pleasures. Those who are competently acquainted with both give a decided preference to the pleasures of the intellect, imagination, and moral feeling. The famous formulation follows: it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. Utilitarianism therefore requires cultivating nobleness of character, both because noble character makes others happier and because the standard is the greatest happiness of all, not of the individual agent alone.

Chapter III addresses motivation. The external sanctions of social approval, legal pressure, and the fear of God attach to utilitarian morality as readily as to any other. The deeper, internal sanction is conscience itself: the subjective pain that accompanies the violation of duty. Mill argues that the feeling of unity with other human beings, when fully cultivated through education, supplies all the motive force that utilitarian morality requires.

Chapter IV takes up proof. Ultimate ends cannot be demonstrated by direct argument, but they can be shown to be what people actually desire. Each person desires their own happiness; therefore the general happiness is desirable as a good to the aggregate of all persons. Mill further argues that other apparent ends (virtue, money, fame, power) are either already parts of happiness or have become so through association, so that nothing is ultimately desired except happiness.

Chapter V is the longest and addresses justice. Mill surveys the many things called just or unjust (respecting legal rights, meeting moral rights, giving desert, keeping faith, maintaining impartiality) and finds that what distinguishes justice from other moral duties is the presence of a right residing in an individual who can claim it. The sentiment of justice, he argues, is the natural impulse of self-defence and sympathy, widened by intelligence and sympathy to cover all persons. Justice is utility concentrated on the interest of security, the most vital of all interests, which is why the demand of justice feels absolute while ordinary calculations of expedience feel provisional.

Key concepts

Terms to know

Greatest Happiness Principle
Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce unhappiness. Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain; unhappiness is pain and the privation of pleasure.
Why it matters: This is the master criterion of right and wrong. Every other utilitarian claim, about quality of pleasures, impartiality, proof, and justice, derives from or defends this principle.
Higher and Lower Pleasures
Pleasures differ in kind, not merely in quantity. Those competently acquainted with both kinds consistently prefer the pleasures of the intellect, imagination, and moral sense, even when they involve more dissatisfaction.
Why it matters: It answers the objection that utilitarianism is a doctrine worthy only of swine, and it explains why the theory demands cultivation of human faculties rather than mere maximization of animal contentment.
Justice as Utility of Security
Justice is not an independent moral faculty but utility applied to the interests so vital, especially security, that their protection raises an unusually powerful and categorical moral demand.
Why it matters: It reconciles the intuitive absoluteness of just claims with a consequentialist foundation, showing that justice is the part of utility that concerns each person's most indispensable interests.

Selected Quotes

Short passages from the source

Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.
John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism
It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.
John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism
happiness is a good: that each person's happiness is a good to that person, and the general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of all persons.
John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism

Source

Text used for this page

Source text: Project Gutenberg edition of Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill.

HTML text: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11224/pg11224.txt

Project Gutenberg states this ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.

Originally published in Fraser's Magazine in 1863; this edition is the seventh, published by Longmans, Green, and Co., 1879.